Peetz, Erickson Answer Questions from Alumni Council

April 20, 2012 at 9:12 pm 11 comments

Six months after the Sandusky scandal broke, there are still questions. Lots of them. And, as Penn State president Rodney Erickson told Alumni Council, “There may be some questions we’ll never have answers for.”

That said, Erickson and Karen Peetz, chair of the Board of Trustees, answered as many as they could Friday afternoon from members of Alumni Council. They touched on everything from the relationship between the trustees and the president (something they agreed is not well enough understood) to what Peetz called “the super-positive of the enduring spirit of Penn Staters.” And they fielded several questions about Joe Paterno, including one that’s been asked at just about every opportunity: When and how will Penn State honor its late football coach?

Peetz said, as she has previously, that Penn State must wait until the Freeh report, more formally known as the findings of the trustees’ special investigations task force, before moving forward on plans to honor Paterno. She called the upcoming report “the ultimate in transparency.”

Former FBI director Louis Freeh was hired by the trustees just weeks after the scandal and charged with looking into all of the issues surrounding the scandal since. His findings—which Peetz said will not be edited by the board—are expected in August or September.

The task force does not have subpoena power. But Peetz said she spoke with Freeh’s investigators for three hours, that more than 200 people have been interviewed, and that Freeh is working with the state attorney general. “These people are not kidding around,” she said. “This is the FBI incarnate, and I don’t think anyone’s lying, I’ll tell you that.”

She also said, again, that board’s biggest regret is firing Paterno via phone call, but that the trustees were concerned that he would hear the news from another source. “Of course, it didn’t go well,” she said.

For most of the session, however, she and Erickson focused on moving forward. Peetz detailed the board’s five new standing committees, including one focusing on risk, compliance, legal, and audit. She mentioned the Board of Trustees election, in which 86 candidates are vying for three alumni seats, and said that she and vice chair Keith Masser (who also attended the Alumni Council session) would attend Saturday’s Meet the Candidates event, which is being facilitated by the Alumni Association. (Click here for more information, and here for candidate responses to questions from The Penn Stater magazine.)

Other notes on the scandal:

—Everyone seems to agree that one lesson from the scandal has been how little Penn Staters know of how the university is governed. At his town hall meetings with alumni in January, Erickson noticed that many alumni seemed to think that the trustees report to the university president, which is not the case. The Board of Trustees runs the university and, as Peetz put it, “delegates power” to the president.

One council member said that the trustees should publicize such information more widely, and Peetz noted that much of the information about the board’s composition is on its website. Also in the works, she said, are videos from the trustees who are chairing the five standing committees.

—In response to a question from a council member who said he was “confounded and embarrassed” by the way Penn State’s settlement with the Paterno estate was handled, Erickson said, “A lot of times, if you could just sit down at the table across from each other, we could get a lot of problems sorted out.” The details of the settlement, which was announced Thursday, can be found here.

Erickson and Peetz addressed some non-scandal issues, too:

—Penn State’s state appropriation was another hot topic. Gov. Tom Corbett proposed a 30 percent cut in the university’s 2012–13 state appropriation (and that of the other state-related universities), on top of last year’s 19.6 percent cut. Erickson called this year’s battle “a watershed.”

Some in the state government want to stop all state funding of higher education, Erickson said, but he was encouraged by the response to his testimony before two legislative committees, in which he explained how Pennsylvania residents would suffer with the cuts.

In particular Friday, he discussed students at the non-University Park campuses, The family income of these students, he said, is 10 percent smaller than that of the typical Pennsylvania, and two-thirds of  students at those campuses work at least 20 hours a week. Many are raising families, as well. “To expect them to be able to take care of the full cost of their education,” he said, “is just not going to happen.”

In response to a question about the trustees’ role in the appropriation fight—the questioner noted that former president Graham Spanier’s public advocacy seemed to rankle Corbett—Peetz said that much of the lobbying is done behind the scenes, and that the governor’s appointees to the board can play a key role. She added, “I don’t think it helped to engage in a public tete-a-tete—Rod is handling this in a much better way. It’s much more positive.”

—Both speakers talked about “good news” from Penn State, with Erickson saying he’s been “buoyed” by students in the past six months. He called TJ Bard, president of University Park’s student government; Peter Khoury, president of the Council of Commonwealth Student Governments and the student trustee; and Jon Lozano, president of the Graduate Student Association, “three of the most outstanding student leaders I have seen here in all my years at Penn State.”

Erickson also noted that despite early concern from rating agencies Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s that the scandal would lead to a decline in research grants, the number of grants is up 15.5 percent from last year, and that the total of $620 million “at this point in the year is unprecedented.” Admissions, he said, are up 1.5 to 2 percent over last year’s record pace.

Lori Shontz, senior editor

Entry filed under: Alumni Association. Tags: , , , , .

Yes, That was a Mule on the HUB Lawn Alumni Meet the Board of Trustees Candidates

11 Comments Add your own

  • 1. gershonpsu  |  April 20, 2012 at 9:52 pm

    Ms. Peetz, Joe Paterno did make some decision on his own. He announced that decision publicly: to resign effective at the end of the season.

    The misinformation has got to stop. We are Penn State graduates, not naive children.

    Every time you excuse yourself and blame Joe, you dig yourself deeper into a black hole.

  • 2. Chris Gerding  |  April 21, 2012 at 9:07 pm

    Ms. Peetz, I was interested in your characterization of the Freeh report as the “ultimate in transparency” . Does this mean that you will agree to release it unedited and unredacted? Or will the Board screen the report carefully before it’s release, making edits as it sees fit?

  • 3. (@psu_rebot)  |  May 13, 2012 at 5:10 pm

    RE: Altering the PSU Record

    We sympathize with the fact that the BOT Chair Peetz quote is an embarrassment, but secretly trying to strike it from the public record (and hoping no one would notice) only exacerbates the Penn State “trust” problem.

    WE ARE – reforming the Penn State Board of Trustees

  • 4. Kim  |  May 13, 2012 at 5:27 pm

    “She also said, again, that board’s biggest regret is firing Paterno via phone call, but that the trustees were concerned that he would hear the news from another source. “Of course, it didn’t go well,” she said, adding…
    –I’m curious why the rest of Peetz’s statement was removed in your article, the part where she said: “In complete hindsight, it would have been wonderful if he had just made some decision on how own.” You included this in the original posting on April 20th, as evidenced in the first comment above. I also printed copies of it as I was so incensed by Peetz’s statement and would be happy to scan it in for people to see the original unedited article.

  • 5. An Alum.  |  May 13, 2012 at 5:36 pm

    We ARE watching, and I would also be curious as to why Peetz’ hypocritical “hindsight” statement was edited out. If the AA is supposed to be impartial, why go out of the way to defend these worthless trustees?

  • 6. Concerned Alumna  |  May 14, 2012 at 10:23 am

    I just don’t know what to think any more about Penn State. I love my alma mater, but it just seems like that “love” is one way. I’m so tired of being lied to. I’m so tired of the board assuming I’m of below average intelligence and will not notice their manipulation of the media and facts. And now, I learn that my alumni publication has bent to the will of the board by omitting Ms. Peetz highly hypocritical “hindsight” comment. Why? Why does this university continually let down the very people who cherish it? We are watching. And we are disappointed time after time…….

  • 7. Tina Hay  |  June 9, 2012 at 8:47 am

    Hi all — I apologize for joining this conversation late. I don’t automatically see all comments on all of our blog posts, and I just now came across these about the Karen Peetz comment. I was the one who edited that line out of Lori’s post. It’s fairly common for me to copy-edit our blog posts either right before or not long after they’re published; in this case the post went up late on a Friday night, and I looked at the post and did the edit the next morning.

    I had attended the discussion with Peetz, Erickson, and Alumni Council, and I thought that that part of the Peetz’s quote might have made more sense, or at least seemed less incendiary, to those who had the benefit of hearing the full discussion. It somehow struck my ears differently when I saw it as a stand-alone sentence in a blog post. I could have asked Lori to expand the blog entry in hopes of adding context, but it was already a pretty long blog post and we all had our hands full that weekend with Meet the Candidates, etc. So the best solution seemed to be to just cut the sentence.

    But I want to make clear that no one from the Board of Trustees asked us to change that. That was something I decided to do. –Tina Hay

  • 8. gershonpsu  |  June 9, 2012 at 10:04 am

    Tina – your convoluted and painful explanation reveals a serious problem. Your edit changed the reality of Ms. Peetz’ answer. She said what she said and she doesn’t get a do-over. How can we trust you to be an honest reporter if you don’t understand that?

  • 9. Tina Hay  |  June 9, 2012 at 10:18 am

    I certainly didn’t intend for my explanation to be convoluted. I think unless we were both at the same discussion and we both heard the entirety of the full hour-long discussion, it would be hard for us to have a productive conversation about this. I realize you disagree. We might just have to leave it at that.

  • 10. Gary Levitt  |  June 9, 2012 at 11:12 am

    It’s your blog and your credibility at stake here. It is, however, our PSAA. When the chairperson of our BoT makes a public statement that is not only incendiary but ill-informed and bordering on irrational, we want to know. The days when the management of our University is hidden behind platitudes and double-speak are over. As a life member since 1964, I expect honesty and courage from the PSAA, not excuses and rationalizations.

  • […] chair of the Board of Trustees hasn’t traditionally addressed Alumni Council. But this is the second straight session in which Peetz has given a report and taken questions from council members. Both times, she’s […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Follow The Penn Stater on Twitter

Enter your email address to follow us and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 513 other followers

%d bloggers like this: